---

•	Baroid

•	Sperry Drilling

•	Drill Bits & Services

•	Testing & Subsea

•	Landmark

•	Wireline & Perforating

•	Artificial Lift

•	Multi-Chem

•	Cementing

•	Production Enhancement

•	Completion Tools

•	Production Solutions

•	Pipeline and Process Services

•	Consulting & Project Management

---

---

•	Developed and published the Conflict-Free Sourcing Procurement Policy on the external website of Halliburton at http://www.halliburton.com/en-US/about-us/supplier-relations/conflict-minerals-policy.page?node-id=hgeyxt74. This policy is applicable to our global operations including our Supply Chain;

•	Assembled a cross-functional internal team among Procurement, Material Management, Finance, Information Technology, and the Legal departments led by our Procurement, Materials & Logistics (PM&L) Performance Management Group;

•

Established a system of controls and transparency by developing a due diligence process using the CMRT. We utilized the SAP e-Sourcing portal to distribute and collect RCOI information from our direct suppliers. This portal gives Halliburton better reporting and data validation capabilities, with real time supplier information from our Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, and allows our suppliers to access our request via an already familiar tool, increasing the participation rate;

•	Stored relevant records in an electronic database on a SharePoint site and in our in-house SAP e-Sourcing portal;

•	Educated 3TG suppliers through Halliburton’s RCOI and due diligence process to take reasonable steps and make good faith efforts to conduct due diligence on the materials supplied to Halliburton; and

•	Offered the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI) eLearning Academy “Conflict Minerals” course for direct suppliers and selected Halliburton employees.

•	Identified direct suppliers that supply products to Halliburton which may contain 3TG. The suppliers were selected in good faith based on the following criteria:

◦	Products supplied to Halliburton plants within the Reporting Period;

◦	Harmonized Tariff Codes and Material Groups of supplied products that may contain metal;

◦	Product sales from Halliburton procurement plants to third party customers; and

◦	Halliburton newly acquired manufacturers with the reporting obligations pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

•	Conducted a survey using the CMRT and SAP e-Sourcing portal. A phone number and email address were available for suppliers and internal stakeholders to correspond;

•	For distributors, provided a product list so distributors could work with second-tier suppliers and asked distributors for a product-level CMRT. If necessary, directly interacted with second-tier suppliers requesting their responses;

•	Implemented deadlines for suppliers’ CMRT submissions;

•	Followed up with non-responsive suppliers requesting their responses. Requested from suppliers the correct/most current point of contact to update our master contact list;

•	Reviewed suppliers’ CMRTs and their reported SORs list, identified any inconsistencies, and required suppliers to take corrective actions and update their submission as needed; and

---

•	Amended our Standard Master Purchase Agreement and Standard Purchase Order Terms & Conditions template to include conflict-free sourcing and disclosure requirements. Communicated these updates to internal stakeholders;

•	Adopted a risk management plan to review due diligence of suppliers and SORs;

•	Monitored and tracked direct suppliers and selected SORs that were identified as not meeting our requirements;

•	Performed risk mitigation efforts by following up with direct suppliers for validation and additional information. We also encouraged smelters with CFSP “Outreach Required” status to participate in an independent third-party audit program;

•	Monitored internal mailbox daily to respond to inquiries in timely manner;

•	Provided findings and progress reports at least bi-weekly to senior management, including the senior director of PM&L Performance Management and the senior manager of Business Controls;

•	Attended various webinars and the CFSI Annual Conference 2015 to understand new developments and best practices; and

•	Obtained an Independent Private Sector Audit (IPSA) by Crowe Horwath attached to this Report.

•	Supported CFSI efforts with our membership (Halliburton member code is HALL). Halliburton also reviewed meeting minutes and discussion from the CFSI Smelter Engagement Team (SET), which contacts smelters to encourage participation and reports potential smelters not in the CFSP database; and

•	Participated in periodic Oil & Gas Services Working Group for Conflict Minerals meetings and/or conference calls to discuss best practices as an industry group. Six companies, including Halliburton, have sent joint letters via email to notify non-compliant smelters stating the expectations of compliance industry wide.

•	Report annually on supply chain due diligence by filing with the SEC a Form SD and Conflict Minerals Report; and

•	Report annually on our company website at

---

•	Developed and published the Conflict-Free Sourcing Procurement Policy on the external website of Halliburton at http://www.halliburton.com/en-US/about-us/supplier-relations/conflict-minerals-policy.page?node-id=hgeyxt74. We informed direct suppliers via our RCOI email;

•	Conducted a conflict minerals survey by reaching to direct suppliers via email and our SAP eSourcing portal. We informed the suppliers that, upon their request, an available Year-To-Date product list purchased by Halliburton can be provided via email. We requested our direct suppliers to provide an updated CMRT if additional information becomes available;

•	Educated 3TG suppliers through Halliburton’s RCOI by providing suppliers with various conflict minerals resources (3TG definition, CFSI website, link to download the most current CMRT, SEC website, how to walk through our SAP eSourcing portal);

•	Offered the CFSI eLearning Academy “Conflict Minerals” course for direct suppliers and selected Halliburton employees. Halliburton sent step-by-step instructions to walk our suppliers and employees through the course information and access. Through Halliburton internal Learning Management System (HalU), we created a course to add completion credit for employees’ training record;

•	Sent multiple reminders to non-responsive suppliers requesting their responses via phone calls and emails. Involved category managers and procurement employees to leverage suppliers’ relationship to reach out to non-responsive suppliers;

•	Reviewed responses from suppliers and requested corrective actions and update if the suppliers provided incomplete or potentially inaccurate information;

•	Compared the SORs identified by the supply chain with the CFSP or an equivalent third-party audit program, such as the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) and Responsible Jewelry Council (RJC);

•	Forwarded the name of the SOR to the CFSI staff if we could not confirm a SOR so they could perform additional diligence;

•	Attended the CFSI Annual Conference 2015 to understand new developments and best practices. Halliburton also financially supported this initiative through membership to CFSI, along with over 300 other member companies and associations from seven different industries, contributing to a range of tools and resources, including the CFSP;

•

Sent 37 outreach emails to date to operational SORs with CFSP “Outreach Required” status identified from CFSI SET team to encourage their participation in an independent third-party audit program. We periodically compared their status with the CFSP database and continue to contact each smelter up to three times if their status has not changed. To date, we have sent follow-up emails with 30 SORs twice and 15 SORs three times; and

•	Participated in periodic Oil & Gas Services Working Group for Conflict Minerals meetings and/or conference calls to understand new developments and best practices as an industry group. Six companies, including Halliburton, have sent joint letters to notify eight non-compliant SORs identified by the group stating the expectations of compliance industry wide.

---

•	208 SORs (74.02%) have received compliant status; meaning audited and found compliant with the relevant CFSP protocol;

◦	9 SORs identified to source 3TG from the DRC or adjoining countries. However to the best of our knowledge, none of these SORs are known to source minerals that benefit armed group in the DRC and adjoining countries.

•	34 SORs (12.10%) have received active status, meaning engaged in the program but not yet certified compliant; and

•	the remaining 39 SORs (13.88%) have not yet received compliant or active status. These will be noted as “Others” in Annex I.

---

---

•	Encourage suppliers to evaluate the business relationship with the SORs that refuse to proceed with an independent third-party audit program;

•	Explore options on how to improve identification and reporting by 3TG product-level identification in our SAP system;

•	Continue providing assistance and education for conflict minerals programs for direct suppliers so that the compliance requirements can escalate down to more tiers of our supply chain;

•	Continue encouraging eligible SORs’ identification from the direct suppliers; and

•	Continue directly contacting identified non-compliant SORs in our supply chain to participate in an independent third-party audit program.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

•

whether the design of Halliburton Company’s (the “Company”) due diligence framework as set forth in Section III of the Conflict Minerals Report for the reporting period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, is in conformity, in all material respects, with the criteria set forth in the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, Second Edition 2013 (“OECD Due Diligence Guidance”), and

•	whether the Company’s description of the due diligence measures it performed, as set forth in section IV of the Conflict Minerals Report for the reporting period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, is consistent, in all material respects, with the due diligence process that the Company undertook.

•	The consistency of the due diligence measures that the Company performed with either the design of the Company’s due diligence framework or the OECD Due Diligence Guidance;

•	The completeness of the Company’s description of the due diligence measures performed;

•	The suitability of the design or operating effectiveness of the Company’s due diligence process;

•	Whether a third party can determine from the Conflict Minerals Report if the due diligence measures the Company performed are consistent with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance;

•	The Company’s reasonable country of origin inquiry (RCOI), including the suitability of the design of the RCOI, its operating effectiveness, or the results thereof; or

•	The Company’s conclusions about the source or chain of custody of its conflict minerals, those products subject to due diligence, or the DRC Conflict Free status of its products.

---

•	the design of the Company’s due diligence framework for the reporting period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, as set forth in section III of the Conflict Minerals Report is in conformity, in all material respects, with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, and

•	the Company’s description of the due diligence measures it performed as set forth in section IV of the Conflict Minerals Report for the reporting period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, is consistent, in all material respects, with the due diligence process that the Company undertook.