---

---

---

•	Maintained the Supplier Ethics Statement on our external website at http://www.halliburton.com/en-US/about-us/supplier-relations/Policies-and-Procedures.page?node-id=hp11nobm, which reflect our commitment and expectation of supplier commitment to ethical business behavior, conflict-free sourcing, and human rights. Suppliers were notified via our RCOI email;

•	Maintained our Human Rights Statement on our external website at http://www.halliburton.com/en-US/about-us/corporate-governance/halliburton-human-rights.page?node-id=hgeyxt6w&SRC=Footer, which reflects our long-standing commitment to uphold human rights as defined by the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR);

•	Continued to include clauses requiring conflict-free materials and products from suppliers in our Master Purchase Agreement (MPA) and standard Purchase Order Terms & Conditions templates. Additionally, suppliers and their business partners are now also contractually bound to protect and uphold the fundamental human rights of their employees as stated in the UDHR;

•	Continued using our internal Conflict-Free Sourcing Policy, updated in 2017, which aligns our conflict minerals program description with the 5-step OECD Framework and makes our employees aware of their responsibilities under the act to use suppliers who do not source 3TG from uncertified SORs;

•	Utilized a cross-functional internal team among the Procurement, Material Management, Finance, Information Technology, and Law departments led by our Procurement, Materials & Logistics (PM&L) Business Compliance & Optimization Group;

•	Retained a third-party service provider to query our applicable suppliers using the CMRT;

•	Continued using a system of controls and transparency by developing a due diligence process using the CMRT, including evaluating and scoring the risk presented by each smelter, refiner, and respondent (supplier providing a CMRT) based on the SORs indicated and due diligence program described;

•	Continued utilizing a platform to upload 2018 supplier information. The platform tracked supplier responses on a real-time basis and allowed us to leverage better data reporting and to take action for non-responsive suppliers;

•	Saved and archived relevant records in an electronic database on a SharePoint site relevant to each year's campaign;

•	Granted all suppliers determined to be in-scope for conflict mineral regulatory purposes a free membership with access to training and information on conflict minerals provided by our third-party service provider;

•	Educated suppliers upon request on Dodd-Frank Action Section 1502, how the Conflict Mineral Rule applies to them and why it is important to respond to our RCOI. Also, provided resources in addition to those from our third-party service provider; and

•

Continued to make our Ethics Helpline available for suppliers to report any violations of the law or violations of our Code of Business Conduct. The RMI also established a grievance mechanism which its members, stakeholders, and the public can utilize to raise concerns about the initiative, the audit program, protocols, SOR operations that fall in-scope of the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP), formerly the Conflict-Free Smelter Program (CFSP), audit quality and auditor competencies, minerals supply chains and upstream/downstream initiatives.

---

•	Identified in-scope suppliers, which are tier one suppliers that supply products to Halliburton that may contain 3TG. Selection was based on the following criteria:

◦	Products supplied to Halliburton plants within the Reporting Period;

◦	Harmonized Tariff Codes and Material Groups of supplied products that may contain metal;

◦	Product sales from Halliburton procurement plants to third party customers; and

◦	Halliburton newly acquired manufacturers with reporting obligations pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

•	Performed audit on supplier data to confirm accuracy of vendor contact information prior to campaign launch;

•	Conducted a survey using the CMRT and our third-party service provider's platform, which included a phone number and email address to facilitate correspondence between suppliers and internal stakeholders;

•	Requested suppliers provide an electronic signature before submitting their data to Halliburton to verify that all answers submitted were accurate to the best of the supplier’s knowledge;

•	Provided a product list for distributors to work with second-tier suppliers and asked distributors for a product-level CMRT, including directly interacting with second-tier suppliers requesting their responses;

•	Established deadlines for suppliers’ CMRT submissions, including requiring our tier one suppliers to provide an updated CMRT if additional information became available;

•	Extended CMRT submission deadline by five days compared to the previous year in order to give suppliers additional time and increase the response rate;

•	Followed up with non-responsive suppliers requesting their responses, through phone calls and emails, including up to four email reminders and two phone call reminders from our third-party service provider;

•	Conducted direct outreach through Halliburton PM&L to non-responsive tier one suppliers requesting their participation in the program;

•	Utilized our third-party service provider to evaluate supplier CMRT responses for plausibility, consistency, and gaps;

•	Analyzed and compared the SORs identified by the supply chain with the following internationally accepted audit standards to determine which SORs are considered “DRC Conflict-Free”: the RMAP, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) and the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC); and

•	Retained status as a member of the RMI (Halliburton member code HALL), through which we:

◦	support engagement by the RMI with SOR(s) and the obtainment of information on country of origin and transit and transportation routes used between mine and SORs;

◦	support the RMI RMAP, which includes an assessment of whether SORs have carried out all five steps of due diligence for responsible supply chains of 3TG from the DRC and adjoining countries; and

◦	support spot checks and/or audits at SOR facilities.

•	Maintained our risk management plan by reviewing the due diligence of suppliers and SORs;

•	Removed over one hundred suppliers from our supply chain for not complying with our conflict mineral requirements;

•	Performed risk mitigation efforts by following up with tier one suppliers for validation and additional information on their smelter data and encouraged all smelters without RMAP “Compliant” status to participate in an independent third-party audit program;

---

•	Sent “thank you” emails to smelters with RMAP “Compliant” status for being certified as conflict-free;

•	Responded to supplier and customer inquiries in a timely manner by both Halliburton and our third-party service provider;

•	Provided findings and progress reports periodically to senior management;

•	Attended webinars and reviewed online resources to learn and understand new developments and best practices;

•

Initiated risk mitigation activities when high-risk facilities were reported on a CMRT by one of the suppliers surveyed. High-risk facilities are those identified by our third-party service provider to source from the DRC or adjoining countries. Through our third-party service provider, submissions that include any of the high risk facilities immediately produce a receipt instructing the supplier to take their own risk mitigation actions, including submission of a product specific CMRT to better identify the connection to products that they supply to Halliburton, and escalating up to removal of these high risk smelters from their supply chain; and

•

Contacted tier one suppliers using a high risk, non-compliant smelter and requested the supplier confirm if the non-compliant smelter was used in the goods supplied to Halliburton. If a supplier confirms or cannot identify that the smelter was used in goods supplied to Halliburton, then we will instruct the supplier to remove the smelter from goods supplied to Halliburton or take steps to help the smelter become compliant.

•	Retained status as a member of the RMI, by which we:

◦	exercise leverage over upstream suppliers indirectly by requiring SORs to undergo an independent third-party audit, which requires due diligence, traceability, chain of custody, risk assessment, and mitigation activities upstream;

◦	support the RMI’s efforts to monitor whether SOR(s) demonstrate significant and measurable improvement within a reasonable time frame from the adoption of their risk management plans; and

◦	support the RMI’s independent third party audits of the SOR’s due diligence practices through the RMAP; and

•	Reviewed meeting notes from the RMI Smelter Engagement Team (SET) and Due Diligence Team.

•	Report annually on supply chain due diligence by filing with the SEC a Form SD and Conflict Minerals Report (CMR); and

•	Upload CMR to our company website at http://ir.halliburton.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=67605&p=irol-sec, on an annual basis.

---

•	253 SORs (80%) have received compliant status; meaning they have been audited and found to be compliant with the relevant RMAP protocol;

◦	3 out of 253 SORs were identified to source 3TG from the DRC or adjoining countries, all of which were found to be conflict-free certified;

•	58 SORs (18%) have not received compliant or active status, and the RMI status for these will be noted as “Other” in Annex I;

◦	33 out of 58 SORs were identified not to source 3TG from the DRC or adjoining countries;

◦	1 out of 58 SORs was identified to source 3TG from the DRC or adjoining countries; and

•	Note: As previously mentioned, this smelter was moved from the compliant list to the non-compliant list in April 2019.

◦	24 out of 58 SORs had unidentifiable 3TG countries of origin; and

•	7 SORs (2%) have received active status, meaning engaged in the program but not yet certified compliant.

---

•	Encouraging non-respondent suppliers to develop corrective action plans to promote compliance with our supplier requirements;

•	Developing corrective action plans for suppliers using an active SOR that sources from the DRC or adjoining countries and has not received compliant or active status from RMI;

•	Encouraging suppliers to evaluate the business relationship with SORs refusing to proceed with an independent third-party audit program;

•	Providing assistance and education regarding the Dodd-Frank Act Section 1502 to suppliers to escalate down compliance requirements to more tiers of our supply chain;

•	Encouraging eligible SORs’ identification from the suppliers; and

•	Contacting SORs without a RMAP “Compliant” status in our supply chain to participate in an independent third-party audit program.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---